ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the effect of sarcopenia on physical performance and nutritional status in elderly patients with gastrointestinal tumors.Methods:a total of 120 eligible in-patients were enrolled from gastrointestinal surgery department of a Grade A tertiary hospital in Ningbo city from September 2021 to January 2022. General clinical data were collected, nutritional risk was screened using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS 2002), physical performance was assessed by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), skeletal muscle index at the third lumbar vertebra level (L3 SMI) was calculated using abdominal CT scan, and grip strength/muscle strength, gait speed by 6 Meter Timed Walk Test and calf circumference were measured. Subjects were divided into sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia group according to the diagnostic criteria of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS). Impacting factors of sarcopenia and the correlation between muscle mass and physical performance in elderly patients with gastrointestinal tumors were analyzed.Results:The overall prevalence rate of sarcopenia in elderly patients with gastrointestinal tumors was 28.3% (34/120) and it was 28.9% (22/76) and 27.3% (12/44) in males and females respectively. There were statistically significant differences in age, tumor stage, nutritional risk, body mass index, calf circumference, L3 SMI, grip strength/muscle strength, gait speed and SPPB score between patients with and without sarcopenia (P<0.05). Muscle strength/grip strength, L3 SMI and gait speed were closely correlated with the occurrence of sarcopenia in elderly patients with gastrointestinal tumors (P<0.05). The L3 SMI was positively correlated with physical performance as assessed with SPPB in both groups.Conclusions:Sarcopenia is a common complication in elderly patients with gastrointestinal tumors with multiple influencing factors. Timely nutritional intervention and exercise intervention should be incorporated into the treatment of elderly gastrointestinal tumor patients with sarcopenia in order to improve nutrition status.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To explore the effect of early enteral nutrition(EEN) and parenteral nutrition(PN) on the postoperative outcomes of patients with gastric cancer and nutritional risk in enhanced recovery after surgery.@*Methods@#A total of 130 patients with gastric cancer hospitalized in department of surgery of Ningbo First Hospitalfrom September 2016 to May 2018 were selected and divided into early enteral nutrition support group (EEN) which was placed with jejunal nutrition tube during the operation, and enteral nutrition started within 12-24 hours after the operation, and parenteral nutrition support group (PN) which was given parenteral nutrition support one day after surgery. Patients in both groups were given nutrients of equal heat and nitrogen.The incidence of nutrition-related complications, the incidence of infection-related complications, the length of postoperative hospital stay and the time of anal exhaust were compared between the two groups.@*Results@#The incidence of nutrition-related complications was 10 cases (15.38%) and 4 cases (6.15%)in EEN group and PN group, that was not statistically different (P=0.157). The incidence of infection-related complications was 3 cases (4.61%) and 5 cases (7.69%) in EEN group and PN group, that was not statistically different (P=0.715). The postoperative hospital stay was 11 days (range, 10-15) and 12 days (range, 11-13)in EEN group and PN group, that was not statistically different (P=0.233). The first anal exhaust time and defecation timewere 64 hours (range, 52-77) and 87 hours (range, 76-100) in EEN group and 72 hours(range, 60-86) and 96 hours(range, 86-120) in PN group, that was statistically different(P=0.001, P=0.034).@*Conclusion@#Enhanced recovery after surgery, early enteral nutrition after gastric cancer surgery may promote the recovery of intestinal function, but the complications and hospital stay after operation are not improved.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the clinical effect of applying standard process management in early enteral nutrition support for elderly patients with gastric cancer after operation. Methods A total of142 elderly patients with gastric cancer in our hospital were randomly divided into control group ( n=71) treated with the traditional nursing of enteral nutrition and intervention group ( n=71) adopting the standardized process man-agement, and then enteral nutrition tolerance, complications, nutritional status and recovery of gastrointestinal function were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in age, sex and preoperative nutritional condition and operation situation between the two groups ( P>0. 05) . The incidence of nutritional intolerance and the cost of nutritional support were lower than those in the control group ( P<0. 05) . The completion rate of enteral nutrition target in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group ( P<0. 05) . The anal exsufflation time and defecation time of patients in the intervention group were shorter than those in the control group ( P<0. 05) . There was no significant difference in pulmonary infec-tion, incision infection and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups ( P>0. 05 ) . Conclusions Standardized process management of early enteral nutrition after operation could significantly improve the toler-ance of enteral nutrition, meanwhile, it has positive significance in promoting rapid recovery of elderly patients with gastric cancer.
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the effect of early enteral nutrition (EEN) and parenteral nutrition (PN) on the postoperative outcomes of patients with gastric cancer and nutritional risk in enhanced recovery after surgery. Methods A total of 130 patients with gastric cancer hospitalized in department of surgery of Ningbo First Hospitalfrom September 2016 to May 2018 were selected and divided into early enteral nutrition support group (EEN) which was placed with jejunal nutrition tube during the operation, and enteral nutrition started within 12-24 hours after the operation, and parenteral nutrition support group (PN) which was given parenteral nutrition support one day after surgery. Patients in both groups were given nutrients of equal heat and nitrogen. The incidence of nutrition-related complications, the incidence of infection-related complications, the length of postoperative hospital stay and the time of anal exhaust were compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of nutrition-related complications was 10 cases (15. 38％) and 4 cases (6. 15％) in EEN group and PN group, that was not statistically different (P = 0. 157). The incidence of infection-related complications was 3 cases (4. 61％) and 5 cases (7. 69％) in EEN group and PN group, that was not statistically different (P = 0. 715). The postoperative hospital stay was 11 days (range, 10-15) and 12 days (range, 11-13) in EEN group and PN group, that was not statistically different (P = 0. 233). The first anal exhaust time and defecation timewere 64 hours (range, 52-77) and 87 hours (range, 76-100) in EEN group and 72 hours (range, 60-86) and 96 hours (range, 86-120) in PN group, that was statistically different (P=0. 001, P=0. 034). Conclusion Enhanced recovery after surgery, early enteral nutrition after gastric cancer surgery may promote the recovery of intestinal function, but the complications and hospital stay after operation are not improved.